Who will win the 2012 Costa book of the year award?

The winner of the 2012 Costa book of the year award will be announced this evening. Who do you think should triumph?


Tonight the Costa book of the year will be announced. It’s a slightly complicated prize that starts with a longlist split into categories, and ends with five books from different genres fighting it out for the glory (and increased sales) of being named book of the year. At about 8pm GMT, we’ll find out if Hilary Mantel has done the triple by winning the and the overall Costa prize, all in the same year.

Here’s a reminder of the five titles on the shortlist, made up of the winners of the five sections:

• Biography winner –
• Novel winner –
• First novel winner –
• Poetry winner –
• Children’s book winner –

Before this shortlist was announced a couple of weeks ago, . A few of you were clear which tiles you were rooting for, but as that stage in the prize was announced on the 2 January, it’s fair to say that a far greater number of you were still in holiday mood and miles away from a computer. We’re hoping that now we’re into the swing of 2013, we’re up for a discussion. So, who do you think will win the 2012 Costa book award? Who do you think should win? Place your bets.


Who will win the 2012 Costa book of the year award?

This article was published on at 12.20 GMT on Tuesday 29 January 2013. It was last modified at 12.21 GMT on Tuesday 29 January 2013.
15 June This practical one-day masterclass will teach writers how to use a range of social media tools to promote their work.

11-12 May Solve the mystery of how to write gripping crime fiction with a two-day investigation into the genre led by top authors .

How virtual currency Bitcoin has been adopted by the local economy in Kreuzberg, Berlin

John Burnside is gripped by an at times almost unbearably poignant thriller that portrays the flipside of the American dream and how ordinary men can veer into madness


Bradley Wiggins capped his remarkable sporting year by taking home the big prize at the ceremony in London
A glass of wine with a rough sleeper, Santa in trunks, a thousand partying Muscovites … in a My Best Shot special, top photographers pick the image that sums up winter for them
Kimon, an eight-year-old pet female long-tailed monkey, treats a kitten as her baby in Bintan Island, Indonesia

Amid depression, bleak stories can be as consoling as self-help

Rather than exhorting the depressed to help themselves, fiction can provide a welcome realisation that we are not alone in despair


The plan has provoked some fascinating discussions, not least the discussion here of how can be more helpful than non self-help. Having studied philosophy, I still have ‘s injunction to stop doing philosophy and start reading novels ringing in my ears, so this is no surprise. What I want to make the case for is those works of fiction that go beyond the positive, beyond stories of survival, works many wouldn’t imagine offering help, would even want to keep out of the hands of the mentally fragile.

I made the case for the dangerousness of the blanket prescription of self-help in the comments on other posts here, the guilt when we do not succeed in pulling ourselves from the mire, the placing of responsibility squarely on the shoulders of those already weakened, vulnerable and sinking between the weight of helplessness.

I say blanket because the thing about is everyone’s experience has unique elements, affects them in subtly different ways, and the thing about treating everyone as the same is that we deny people the uniqueness of their voices. We become complicit with a condition that has already stripped people of so much of themselves, play the role of the seemingly good Samaritan who finds a victim on the road, proffers a seemingly friendly hand, and uses it to administer the final beating.

So the only real starting place I have is not a generality but my own experience. for me is like the thickest, blackest fog. When it shrouds you, you see nothing. There is just you, alone with your thoughts, any screams dampened instantly and being met, in return, by silence. The far horizon of wellness is unimaginable. All you can hope for in your isolation is to feel the nudge of human contact beside you. Like a character emerging from the ground into a post-apocalyptic dystopia, you long to breathe out the long, toxic sigh of utter relief that you are not, after all, alone.

There have been four times in my life when the fog has descended. Each breakdown has had its own characteristics but, and I know this is not universal, each time fiction has been able to nestle itself alongside me inside that blinding blanket. I know for many others, depression takes away the ability to concentrate altogether, so storytelling of any kind becomes white noise, meaningless squiggles dancing on the page. I was lucky, but even for me I am careful to say fiction because there were times when just holding a book was impossible, when only film could reach me.

I want to talk very briefly about the fictions that spoke to me, kept me warm in the loneliness, slowly cajoled me through. They were never survivors’ stories, though many of the protagonists did survive. What mattered to me was always the honest, detailed, unflinching accounts of their darkest moments, of the reality of those moments and how they blanked, greyed, sensually cut short and tortured their lives. What these fictions, or rather characters within them (much more than the stories of which those characters were a part), provided was the knowledge that I was not alone, that there was someone somewhere who was ale to articulate the seething, jumbled, brutal, pre-linguistic, thrashing, writhing, hazing, dulling pounding in my head. It wasn’t just me. That single thought was the most important thing in the world to me, sometimes the one thing that kept me alive – a single false note of optimism would have shattered it all for me, left me thinking yes, it really is just me – the words people offer me really are just that, words, the hope they contain utterly irrelevant because they relate to an experience that is not mine. Two-and-a-half decades after my first breakdown, when I curated the event , I wanted to capture that lack of false promise, that focus solely on the moment, asking a selection of authors to write about the what-it-was-likeness of their darkest moment.

So, these are the characters who held my hand under those stifling blankets as it were – Teresa from ‘s , Betty from Philippe Djian’s , Julie from the film and finally someone real, Holly from , a memoir from New York-based writer, artist and model Katelan V Foisy about a childhood friend whose life ended in the tragedy of an overdose. Each reached through the fog, made points of contact in different ways.

Aside from the fact that there is a Juliette Binoche theme here (Damage’s Anna Barton or Michèle from Les Amants du Pont-Neuf would also have been at home on the list), let me look at what it was about these characters that spoke to me. Teresa and Betty are both doomed, and their journeys to their doom are in man ways opposites. Betty’s story is that of a spiral from anarchic abandon, a life completely outside of society, ever downward to the hospital bed in which she will ultimately die – every ounce of her life force has been sucked from her until she is just a shell.

Teresa’s life on the other hand is cut short at just the moment she has found happiness. For me at my lowest, their tragedies felt very similar to each other and to my own experience. Both Teresa and Betty strove (something the current ludicrous “striving” propaganda would do well to note) with every sinew to expand their worlds and both were thwarted. Betty is thwarted from outside, by a world whose demands crush down on her; Teresa from inside, from an inner fragility – what she describes as a weakness in the resonant line “I am weak; I am going back to the country of the weak” – that simply cannot weather the rough waters of life’s open sea. Teresa finds a kind of comfort in her shrunken horizons, in no longer having to strive, whilst the fence the world builds around Betty’s dreams forces her restless mind in on itself until she implodes. Teresa longs to be something she is not, Betty longs to be something that she is but is not allowed to be. These two books express those simple frustrated longings that felt like the two halves of my deepest self with honesty, poignancy, and not a false note.

Three Colours: Blue is a strange one, because it is a survivor’s story. In many ways it is the archetypal survivor’s story. Its heroine, Julie, loses everything when her husband and daughter are killed in a crash. She makes that “everything” into a reality, selling her home, giving away everything in it, cutting herself off from everyone she knew in her former life only to emerge from a cocoon of absolute numbness to a future whose content we don’t really know other than that her freedom from the past offers her endless possibility (symbolised by the colourless sugar cube soaking up coffee in one of the most famous takes in 20th-century cinema). As a survivor’s story, this should have left me cold, hurt, alienated. Maybe one reason it didn’t, when I first saw it in the mid-1990s in the midst of a breakdown that had stripped me of every vestige of self-worth, has to do with my deep love of the textures of Kieslowski’s films, or of . But there’s more to it than that. Again it’s the honesty of Julie’s total numbness in the weeks and months after she comes out of hospital following the crash. The way Julie divests herself of her old life as though she is washing away a dirt that has crept beneath her skin, the absolute lack of emotion, a void at the centre of her being that comes not from an inherent coldness but a coldness that life has planted in her, an ice crystal grown from seed. What I learned from Julie was not that it was OK to feel down, but that it was OK to feel nothing.

Holly’s story in Blood and Pudding is absolutely not that of a survivor. The book is a series of transcriptions of recordings from a teenage roadtrip, intercut with anecdotes from the brief years between those few days and Holly’s death from a heroin overdose. It is difficult subject matter to discuss in the context of mental health. Holly was bipolar, she didn’t survive, and more than one person I’ve spoken to about this remarkable story (which includes wonderful moments such as the time she and Katelan were ejected from a video peep show booth for playing spaces invaders on the “select a screen” joystick) has asked whether it’s not a dangerous glorification of a reckless lifestyle.

I think, rather, it’s the perfect illustration of the way everyone responds differently to things. For some people, a how-to book will be the ladder out of hell. For others, the guilt it induces, the sense that “so this is one more thing I cannot do” will be the thing that finally pulls the ladder out of sight. For me, Blood and Pudding is a book that shows the light and shade in every life. At my lowest ebb it showed me that there could be moments of joy, showed me that even the briefest, bleakest life could be a life fully lived – and it was that which helped me on the road to making my life not so brief. Yes, for others it may have the opposite effect. But it asks the vital question – why is there a general assumption that a book that “ends well” is a good thing and one that “ends badly” is not? Do we instinctively value those people whose problems are easier to fix or is it just that we would rather put our heads in the sand when it comes to those who respond to something we don’t understand?

Everyone’s depression is different. That is one of the things that makes it so hard to treat. Acknowledging the differences is one of the most important things we can do, both because no one is an expert as much as the person who has the mental health problem, and because this is the first step to re-empowering people not further stripping them. So widening what we do for mental illness to include books can play an important role in finding the right blend for each person. But it should be part of finding an even more, not an even less personalised approach to mental illness, and using it either as a replacement or the narrowing it right back down by offering only a tiny list of titles riddled with preconceptions is a step backward from that person-based approach.


Amid depression, bleak stories can be as consoling as self-help

This article was published on at 14.39 GMT on Monday 4 February 2013. It was last modified at 18.56 GMT on Monday 4 February 2013.
22-23 June A weekend course introducing aspiring screenwriters to the nuts and bolts of writing for film.

27-28 April Danny Leigh and Peter Bradshaw explore the lives and works of ten cinematic greats in a weekend for film-lovers.

15 June This practical one-day masterclass will teach writers how to use a range of social media tools to promote their work.

11-12 May Solve the mystery of how to write gripping crime fiction with a two-day investigation into the genre led by top authors .

How virtual currency Bitcoin has been adopted by the local economy in Kreuzberg, Berlin
The Guardian has picked five documentaries that explore intriguing and unexpected stories for a new season of films. for a chance to win one of 500 free streams.
The Monastery: Mr Vig and the Nun is an award-winning film about a millionaire who wants to establish a Russian Orthodox religious order in his castle. .

Find out the key points from our online discussion on academic health science networks

Was the first world war accompanied by a rising literary nationalism?

The Rest is Noise festival is set to examine the ways in which national spirit permeated the cultural landscape in the years either side of 1914. But did literature buck the wider trend?


Virginia Woolf Making waves … But what to make of Virginia Woolf’s teasing suggestion that ‘human character changed’ in 1910? Photograph: George C Beresford/Getty Images

, the investigation of the culture of the 20th century at London’s Southbank Centre, continues this weekend with .

The premise for this session is that, following the collapse of so many great imperial families around the first world war, the world moved away from old-fashioned, dynasty-based internationalism and began celebrating local traditions and customs. Or as the programme has it:

“New nations emerge, such as Finland and Hungary, eager to learn about their heritage. Established nations, such as France and England, also look inwards at their unique characters. Innovative artists, carried by the mood of the times, start uncovering and experimenting with folk music.”

On Saturday, Professor Christopher Clark, author of , will be outlining the major trends in the volatile period leading up to the first world war. There will also be a documentary look at the life of the Australian-born composer , and performances of the music of Ralph Vaughan Williams, Leoš Janáček and Béla Bartók (the last of whom will also be the subject of a talk from the wonderful George Szirtes). All of which sounds fascinating – and clear enough. But I’m especially intrigued to see how the organisers are going to chart a course through the literary currents of the time. Not least because not all of them flow in a convenient direction.

If I were looking for a burgeoning of literary interest in national character and folk traditions, for instance, I’d start much earlier – in 1814, say, with the first of Walter Scott’s novels, and all that that combined with various other invented traditions () to help create the notion of the Scottish nation.

Meanwhile, it’s difficult to spot a new folk influence among the major writers in the years surrounding the first world war (unless you go back a bit again, and include people like Hardy).

Even overt patriotism isn’t as common as you might expect. OK, . There’s Erskine Childers’ , and a growing chorus of jingoistic sentiment on all sides leading up to 1914. And a talk on Sunday led by Richard Price, Daniel Pantano and Carol Rumens will look at the way the war scarred poets such as Guillaume Apollinaire and Isaac Rosenberg. Doubtless xenophobia, national pride and shame will play a part there.

But in spite of these examples, I find it tricky to gauge the strength of the tide of nationalism – at least in English literature. It isn’t just that there was so much resistance from writers like Wilfred Owen (who, of course, condemned the ) – it’s that so many people weren’t even in the same water.

In one of the talks this weekend, Rachel Bowlby will discuss (pdf), , and take on her teasing contention that “on or about December 1910, human character changed”. I can’t imagine that being anything other than interesting – but I can’t imagine it being specifically concerned with nationalism either. As far as I can make out, Woolf looks everywhere but locally to explain this change in character:

“The first signs of it are recorded in the books of Samuel Butler, in The Way of All Flesh in particular; the plays of Bernard Shaw continue to record it. In life one can see the change, if I may use a homely illustration, in the character of one’s cook. The Victorian cook lived like a leviathan in the lower depths, formidable, silent, obscure, inscrutable; the Georgian cook is a creature of sunshine and fresh air; in and out of the drawing-room, now to borrow The Daily Herald, now to ask advice about a hat.”

Yes, you can always count on Virginia Woolf to be an astonishing snob, as well as provocative and amusing. Of course, she wasn’t just talking about servants:

“All human relations have shifted – those between masters and servants, husbands and wives, parents and children. And when human relations change there is at the same time a change in religion, conduct, politics, and literature. Let us agree to place one of these changes about the year 1910.”

Yet that brief mention of politics is as far as she goes along those lines. The rest of the essay is compulsory reading – but for what she says about literary presentation, rather than national spirit. There’s a brief notice of differences between English, French and Russian writers, but not much more. Significantly (if you buy my line of argument), the writers Woolf cites as representing the “change” that took place in 1910 don’t immediately spark off thoughts about local traditions, customs or characteristics: “Mr Forster, Mr Lawrence, Mr Strachey, Mr Joyce, and Mr Eliot.”

Eliot, Strachey and Lawrence, not to mention Woolf herself, all gave off a nasty pong of anti-semitism, and so might be said to foreshadow the new nationalism’s horrific ultimate conclusion. But, Joyce aside, do you see them saying much about what it means to belong to a nation state? I, at least, have to look pretty hard to see it. Perhaps there’s something pastoral in Forster? Perhaps says something about British nation building? Perhaps Lawrence’s yeomen and workers show who did most of the heavy lifting during that building?

Maybe. And even if I sound doubtful there, I wouldn’t want to pretend that nationalism wasn’t important to plenty of other writers. Until I read the programme for the weekend, it wouldn’t have occurred to me to think about GK Chesterton in such a context, for instance, but on Sunday Patrick Wright will be looking at the idea of English nationalism and cultural roots in his writing. There must be plenty of other currents I haven’t spotted, too. So what do you think? Were the 1910s and early 1920s as important for nationalism in literature as they were in music and the rest of contemporary culture? And who else should we be thinking about? Or is it more complicated than that?


Was the first world war accompanied by a rising literary nationalism?

This article was published on at 17.21 GMT on Tuesday 29 January 2013.
15 June This practical one-day masterclass will teach writers how to use a range of social media tools to promote their work.

11-12 May Solve the mystery of how to write gripping crime fiction with a two-day investigation into the genre led by top authors .

How virtual currency Bitcoin has been adopted by the local economy in Kreuzberg, Berlin

John Burnside is gripped by an at times almost unbearably poignant thriller that portrays the flipside of the American dream and how ordinary men can veer into madness

Children’s literature’s best imaginary friends

Not getting on too well with school, I found some of my most intimate allies in the pages of Enid Blyton, Diana Wynne Jones and others. How about you?


As a child who loved , I often inadvertently alienated other kids (“Weirdo!”) by mentioning, say, Prometheus and his eagle to illustrate my fear and dread of maths homework. Having thus driven away my peers, I played perforce with fictional pals – not so many gods and goblins (although I always hoped to encounter in a drowsy midsummer meadow), but an esoteric selection of schoolkids, heroes, outlaws – and dogs.

For nearly a year I was , rubbing shoulders with young cosmopolites on the Alpine slopes of Elinor Brent-Dyer’s novels, and wishing both that interestingly thin, delicate and raven-haired Joey Bettany was my actual best friend, and that was a timetabled element of my school day. Reading some later Chalet School books recently, I discovered to my dismay that poor Jo wound up the proud owner of about 10 children, including triplets (think of her pelvic floor!) although she also became a bestselling novelist. But neither her inordinate fertility nor the regrettably sanctimonious attitudes of girls and mistresses alike can deter me from settling down on the floor in any well-stocked secondhand bookshop to renew my fond acquaintance with Jo, Grizel, the Robin and the blue-blooded (but inkstained) Princess Elizaveta.

I also attended another school, this onefraught with the horrible risk of being burned as a witch – Larwood House, the hideous institution where takes place. I felt drawn to Larwood House partly because Jones perfectly conjures the dull pain of school cliques – “real boys” and “real girls”, armoured in merit badges, at the top of the pecking order, with fat Nan Pilgrim and forbidding Charles Morgan at the bottom. A fellow pariah, I often swapped stories with witty, warm, intelligent Nan in empty classrooms as I waited hopefully for my own dangerous, fascinating witch-gift to manifest.

I wasn’t always girly, or even female, in the company I kept. I embarked as a young Norseman in , fighting back-to-back with the golden-haired Thorkell, and was reddened to the elbows in the blood of battle. I went on (the Norse name for Byzantium) with Harald Sigurdson and his friends, and demonstrated my skill with a sword as they did, slicing thrown figs into equal halves. (This was definitely wishful thinking – the only thing I ever cut in half with my Swiss Army knife was the top of my thumb.) I also punctured the odd bicycle tyre with bow and arrows while shooting venison in the greenwood with Robin Hood and his merry men, particularly in .

Especially as an outlaw of the woods, I longed for a dog, as fervently as Ben does in Phillipa Pearce’s heartbreaker, . Like Ben, I had to make do for a long time with imagined hounds – but unlike Ben, I borrowed all mine from books, instead of creating my own indomitable companion from a picture. Enid Blyton’s sagacious canines, with their wisdom, loyalty and protective teeth, loped often at my heels – , Lucky the circus terrier, and faithful (though sometimes foolish) Scamper, the Secret Seven spaniel. Despite pocketsful of muddy lead-length bits of string, and a well-practiced whistle, I was underprepared for the reality of an eventual Jack Russell puppy.

Who were you, and who did you play with, if you had more book-friends than real ones as a child? And are you still, secretly, a Chaletian or a Viking?


15 June This practical one-day masterclass will teach writers how to use a range of social media tools to promote their work.

11-12 May Solve the mystery of how to write gripping crime fiction with a two-day investigation into the genre led by top authors .

How virtual currency Bitcoin has been adopted by the local economy in Kreuzberg, Berlin

John Burnside is gripped by an at times almost unbearably poignant thriller that portrays the flipside of the American dream and how ordinary men can veer into madness

Tips, links and suggestions

A weekly space for us to talk about what you’re reading this week, and our review list


Each week, we reserve a space on the books site for you to discuss, recommend and take issue with the books you have recently read. Here’s a roundup of what you said last week:

:

I must give another recommendation for a wonderful book by John Vaillant called The Tiger, I read a week back. The pleasure was only heightened by the fact that it was a book stumbled upon while idly browsing the travel shelves of an independent bookstore. I don’t very often feel compelled to post reader reviews, but this book was worthy of a puff, so I did one:

:

I’m re-reading Jean-Paul Sartre’s The Reprieve. I read it when I was at university, and it changed the way I thought about the world. I love his Roads to Freedom trilogy, especially the first one, The Age of Reason. I am finding that these books mean something different to me as I get older, and I enjoy them just as much now as I ever did. Although I must admit that Nausea seems a little self-indulgent to me now, whereas when I was 18 it seemed so significant!

choice of reading unlocked a deep love and respect for :

I really enjoyed his ‘The Maintenance of Headway’, and last week I picked up ‘Explorers of the New Century’, also by Magnus Mills for the second time, having started it at Christmas, read two pages and then left it at my sister’s 150 miles away. This time, I’d finished it by the end of the week.

It tells of two groups of brave (and rather eccentric) explorers who set off, separately but simultaneously across a freezing waste to find the very distant Agreed Farthest Point. Why they are doing this only becomes apparent towards the end, and to most readers will probably come as rather a surprise. As our uncomplaining heroes squabble their way across the vast waste, Mills’ completely deapan humour retains precisely its gently-throbbing, evenly-paced murmer even as the story darkens. ‘Explorers of the New Century’ is an allegory but, and it might just be me, I thought I detected a rather subersive, further subtext right at the end*.
This is certainly one my top five books in the last couple of years.

:

Restraint of Beasts is brilliant. Anyone who spent 1970s doing terrible jobs which involved living in cheap accommodation far from home will smile wryly at this.

All Quiet on the Orient Express is a must too. It’s the obsessiveness of his characters that is so funny. And the relentlessness of things.

‘I LOVE MAGNUS MILLS!’ Exclaimed before continuing:

A colleague recommended All Quiet On the Orient Express to me years ago and I’ve never looked back. I’ve read practically everything he has done. I’ve only got Screwtop Thompson (a book of short stories) and A Cruel Bird Came to the Nest and Looked In left to read. And they are both on my shelves so thanks for re-entering them into the endless selective struggle of “What shall I read next”!

My favourite is still All Quiet…
then Explorers…- you are right, the twist is extraordinary. I didn’t see it coming at all!
then, Restraint of Beasts- the comedy duo of Tam and Richie are pure magic.

:

Magnus Mills is one of the few authors whose books I buy as soon as they are published, and I feel a little bit jealous of people who have books by him still to read. I think ‘A Scheme For Full Employment’ is possibly the best starting point for anyone looking to get into him, but all of his novels are excellent – he has a unique way of writing situations that are gently humorous on the surface, with a subtle disturbing undercurrent. The only two I was slightly disappointed with are ‘The Maintenance Of Headway’ and his short story collection, ‘Screwtop Thompson’, neither of which I felt really lived up to his usual standard.

@tenuousfives – You should definitely re-read ‘Three To See The King’. I was going to write that it is one of my favourites but then I thought about ‘Explorers’ and ‘All Quiet On The…’ and even ‘A Cruel Bird….’ and… I don’t know.

:

Has anybody read Oakley Hall’s Warlock? It is the next book I have in line to read and I should be ready for it by Saturday.

I must confess that I only bought it because Thomas Pynchon is a big fan. I have bought numerous books in the past on his recommendation.

Does anybody else buy books because their favourite author/s write an introduction for it or put their name to a glowing review on the front/back?

An interesting question…

Thanks to for the photo at the top of the blog. If you ‘d like to show us what you are reading rather or as well us tell us about it, do upload your snaps to our .

I’d also like to welcome the thread who (I think) is new to TLS.

Here’s a selection of the books we’ll be reviewing this week, subject to last minute changes. You can browse through all our reviews, by either going to a specific book page through , or by visiting our .

Non-Fiction

• by Deirdre David
• by John Gray
• by Richard Hingley
• by Oliver James
• by Lawrence Keppie
• by Roy Morris, Jnr
• by Marco Roth
• by Will Storr
• by Norman Stone

Fiction

• by Christopher Brookmyre
• by Jim Crace
• on Lucy Ellmann
• by Woody Guthrie


Tips, links and suggestions: What are you reading today?

This article was published on at 14.06 GMT on Tuesday 12 February 2013. It was last modified at 14.10 GMT on Tuesday 12 February 2013.
15 June This practical one-day masterclass will teach writers how to use a range of social media tools to promote their work.

11-12 May Solve the mystery of how to write gripping crime fiction with a two-day investigation into the genre led by top authors .

How virtual currency Bitcoin has been adopted by the local economy in Kreuzberg, Berlin

John Burnside is gripped by an at times almost unbearably poignant thriller that portrays the flipside of the American dream and how ordinary men can veer into madness


Bradley Wiggins capped his remarkable sporting year by taking home the big prize at the ceremony in London
A glass of wine with a rough sleeper, Santa in trunks, a thousand partying Muscovites … in a My Best Shot special, top photographers pick the image that sums up winter for them
Kimon, an eight-year-old pet female long-tailed monkey, treats a kitten as her baby in Bintan Island, Indonesia
A weekly open thread for readers to tell us what’s missing from the site, and point us towards good things to cover

Rereading Stephen King

This tale of a stereotypical nerd who buys a possessed car plays into the hands of those detractors who label Stephen King’s work formulaic. I suspect it was the first time his fans felt cheated


The easiest period of ‘s writing to talk about is his early years. Back then, he was carving his own niche. He wasn’t universally loved, but he was universally sold, and that was probably enough for him. , of course. They were well-hidden – and I’ll talk more about that come time – but they were there. Still, the books came, mainly because he had them squirrelled away. was published between and , but it was written much earlier, back when King was perhaps more in control of what he was actually doing. Christine was the truth poking out from the lie of Rita Hayworth and The Body.


Christine is the story of Arnold “Arnie” Cunningham (a name taken from two characters), a shortsighted bookish type (a “loser”) who has only one friend and not much of a life. He’s an aching stereotype, but that’s not always a bad thing – as King had shown before – particularly when the stereotype breaks their mould and becomes the hero. So, we accept that he is somewhat nerdy; we accept that his one friend, Dennis, is one of the most hollow characters King has ever written, seemingly existing only to tell Arnie to be careful (and given that he’s the narrator of the book, that’s some going); and we accept that Arnie would see a battered, ruined 1958 Plymouth Fury on his way home from school and just buy it. No ifs or buts: he’s taken in, wanting to be cool, and he falls in love.

It’s sold to Arnie by a crotchety back-brace-wearing old man called Roland LeBay, who loves that car, but it’s time to sell it on. Dennis doesn’t like LeBay. Dennis doesn’t like the car. Dennis doesn’t like the idea of just buying a car outright (“To my ever increasing , Arnie pulled his wallet out … “). Arnie buys the car anyway, takes it to a garage and learns how to turn it into the car of his dreams: fixing the engine, the paintwork. Arnie then begins a transformation: taking on some of LeBay’s traits, his curmudgeonly ways, his gruff demeanour. He is suddenly (and inexplicably) attractive to a new girl in town, Leigh (another of King’s early easy stereotypes: like Susan in , she is a Very Nice Girl). Leigh and Arnold begin dating. Arnie is a moron, and becomes more and more like LeBay, even to the point where he starts wearing a back brace. Dennis develops a thing for Leigh – adding a smidgen of personality to the narrative – and then, over the next god-knows-how-many pages, things come to a head, and we discover, shock of shocks, that somehow the car is possessed by LeBay or something, and that maybe it’s now trying to possess Arnie, and oh my god ARNOLD rearranged is ROLAND and on and on. The car drives itself into a trap set by Leigh and Dennis, and is crushed. Arnie dies in a (potentially) unrelated car crash. Dennis, the narrator with nothing to him, becomes one of King’s stereotypes himself: the writer looking back on events, wondering what might have been.

For such a straightforward narrative, it’s a bit of a structural mess. While most of the book is in first-person, with Dennis as our trusty reliable narrator, there’s a section where he ends up in hospital after a football accident and the narrative switches, inexplicably, to third-person omniscient. It’s jarring and clumsy – or it would be if it wasn’t close enough to the tepid style of narrative presented in Dennis’s voice the rest of the way through. (Incidentally, King has said that he “wrote into a box” when working on Christine, putting Dennis in hospital, and that the narrative shift was the only way out of that, which sounds suspicious to me: I can think of a number of ways to solve that particular narrative pickle.) When we get Dennis back, nothing much has changed. It doesn’t even feel as if he hasn’t been with us, not really. Come the end of the novel, it’s still not clear who the third-person narrator is, or how Dennis knows what it reported. Both narrations are hollow, an accusation I’d level at much of the rest of the book. None of the characters feels like they’re worth much, being either underwritten (in the case of Dennis and Leigh) or overwritten (in the way that Arnie – and, by default, LeBay – seems to just become more and more ridiculous as the novel goes on).

I’ve mentioned before the detractors who say King’s oeuvre consists of a simple formula: x (where x = any seemingly innocuous thing: dog, hotel, clown etc), + y (where y = possession, demons, the undead) = novel. It’s an accusation that only exists because some of King’s more commercially famous novels play off these now-standard horror novel devices. For the most part, it’s completely ridiculous, and more than a little unfair. Except for, I’d argue, here. Christine is a novel that, King once said, began life as a short story. It could have been, like The Mangler or Trucks, a nice little short that did this entire plot in 40 pages. But it’s not. It was sold as a big deal, King’s next big horror novel, and, I suspect, it was the first time that a lot of his fans felt cheated. I reckon King probably does too: it’s nowhere near his best. Given the existence of another novel in King’s catalogue that deals with a supernatural car, 2002′s , maybe King wanted to try this again, just to prove it could be done?

Connections

Christine – or, a red and white 1958 Plymouth Fury, at least – turns up in a few other King novels. In it’s driven around by Henry Bowers’ psychotic father, in a car of the same description makes a number of appearances (including being driven by the psychotic Johnny Dunhill – see the theme?) and in , Stu Redman and Tom Cullen find said model of car abandoned, with a key bearing the initials AC inside.

Next

King writing the most pure horror novel he’s ever written: it’s (sic).


at 14.40 GMT on Wednesday 30 January 2013. It was last modified at 14.45 GMT on Wednesday 30 January 2013.
15 June This practical one-day masterclass will teach writers how to use a range of social media tools to promote their work.

11-12 May Solve the mystery of how to write gripping crime fiction with a two-day investigation into the genre led by top authors .

How virtual currency Bitcoin has been adopted by the local economy in Kreuzberg, Berlin

John Burnside is gripped by an at times almost unbearably poignant thriller that portrays the flipside of the American dream and how ordinary men can veer into madness

Tips, links and suggestions

A weekly space for us talk about what you’re reading this week, and our review list


There’s two week’s worth of reading covered in the . Here are the highlights, starting with the merits of reading in stereo:

:

I’m reading A Heart So White by Javier Marias after hearing him on a BBC World Service podcast, talking about the book. It had been on my Amazon wishlist for years but I found him such an engrossing and interesting guest on that podcast, that I ordered the book almost as soon as I had finished listening to it.

:

I’m currently reading and listening to “Parade’s End” by Ford Madox Ford. And it’s very enjoyable. I like the listening/ reading combination, especially with a complex dense novel like this one: in effect it means I read the book twice. The narration into the audiobook I am listening to is superb. I sneaked a look on YouTube at the previews for the recent television dramatisation, but don’t really feel tempted to watch any more of it. For me a well read audiobook can bring a text to life far more vividly.

Any other audiobooks recommendations? Do post them in the thread below.

:

Just finished The Snow Child by Eowyn Ivey. Think Little House on the Prairie meets Han Christian Andersen. Not as whimsical as I’d feared but something altogether more solid and grounded and an absorbing read.

And a popular idea posted by :

I’d definitely be interested in reading some novel/film adaption analysis articles. I’m very anxious about the impending “Cloud Atlas” film – not at all sure that I want to go and see it.

I’ll see what I can do. Here’s the trailer – the long one – if haven’t seen it and would like to.

Reading on mobile?

So, on with this week. Here are the books we’ll be writing about and reviewing this week, subject to last minute changes, as always.

Non-fiction

• by Paula Byrne
• by Travis Elborough
• by James Lasdun
• by Paul Kildea
• by Cheryl Strayed

Fiction

• by Katie Kitamura
• by Scott Hutchins
• by Ayana Mathis
• by Dan Rhodes
• by Emma Chapman
• by Philippe Claudel

Children

• by Geraldine McCaughrean


Tips, links and suggestions: What are you reading today?

This article was published on at 11.39 GMT on Tuesday 5 February 2013.
15 June This practical one-day masterclass will teach writers how to use a range of social media tools to promote their work.

11-12 May Solve the mystery of how to write gripping crime fiction with a two-day investigation into the genre led by top authors .

How virtual currency Bitcoin has been adopted by the local economy in Kreuzberg, Berlin

John Burnside is gripped by an at times almost unbearably poignant thriller that portrays the flipside of the American dream and how ordinary men can veer into madness


Bradley Wiggins capped his remarkable sporting year by taking home the big prize at the ceremony in London
A glass of wine with a rough sleeper, Santa in trunks, a thousand partying Muscovites … in a My Best Shot special, top photographers pick the image that sums up winter for them
Kimon, an eight-year-old pet female long-tailed monkey, treats a kitten as her baby in Bintan Island, Indonesia
A weekly open thread for readers to tell us what’s missing from the site, and point us towards good things to cover

Reading group

Who is Odette? Why is a great autobiographical novel giving Swann so much space? And how would you sum up the experience?


Swann In Love Who’s he? And who’s she? … Swann In Love, in the 1984 film with Jeremy Irons as Swann, and Ornella Muti as Odette. Photograph: Ronald Grant Archive

I’m closing in on the last 50 pages of my translation of The Way by Swann’s and, like much literature, it’s posing many more questions than it answers.

Who, for instance, is Odette? We see her almost exclusively through the lens of Swann’s obsession. He distorts her so much that I feel I know nothing about her – beyond that she has the power to be all-consuming. I’ve hardly even heard her speak beyond a few curt words about why she can’t meet poor old Swann, and in denial of his accusations. So it is that, like Swann, I’ve experienced Odette almost entirely as an absence – and so, like him, I am pushed to wonder all the more about her, and what she may be up to. I feel unsettled, doubtful, unresolved. Is she worth the trouble? Is she at fault? Is Swann? What is she after? What will she get?

I’m equally uncertain of the greater purpose of the book or where it is heading. Why is the narrative about Swann there at all, beyond its inherent interest? Why did the narrator Marcel feel the need to include it? Why did Proust? Where is he taking us with all these words, these ruminations, these ideas, this talk of hawthorn blossom?

I’m even confused about the nature of this reading group. If you remember, In Search Of Lost Time was nominated as a book to help us celebrate LGBT history month. Yet so far, the narrative has barely mentioned anything to do with any kind of homosexual love, beyond certain insinuations about Odette’s life away from Swann. At least, I don’t think there have been gay references – although I’m starting to wonder if they are there, and I’m just missing them.

In short, it’s wonderfully intriguing. Let’s try to address all those questions, and more, over the course of the month. But at this stage, I don’t dare hazard answers. I need to let things sit for a while. I need to read around the subject. I also need (and brace yourself if, like me, you originally thought we could get away with discussing just one volume) to keep on going. Soon after I finish this piece, I’m going to tackle those final pages – and then immediately embark on book two. How can I not?

In the meantime, if anyone has ideas about these questions, do post them below, along with any suggestions for further reading that might provide a few solutions – and, yes, questions of your own.

Also, because all that sounds rather heavy, and because in order to do justice to Proust we also need to acknowledge his wicked sense of humour, I here invite you to try to summarise In Search of Lost Time.

Summarising Proust has a noble history, dating back to , in which a series of contestants try to sum up In Search Of Lost Time in 15 seconds. The contestants all fail to get much beyond the opening; but since then, academics and. Some time around 1980, for instance, to three neat words: Marcel devient écrivain (Marcel becomes a writer). Vincent Descombes improved on that soon afterwards, but upped the word count with: Marcel devient un grand écrivain (Marcel becomes a great writer). A wag on provides the wonderfully concise: “Marcel.”

Can you do better? Or if, like me, you are yet to complete the full Proust marathon, can you sum up what you have read so far? It’s not as easy as you might think. My own best effort is “Marcel falls asleep, Swann falls in love.” I’m sure there must be something better than that …


Reading group: Can you summarise Proust? | Sam Jordison

This article was published on at 14.58 GMT on Tuesday 12 February 2013. It was last modified at 14.59 GMT on Tuesday 12 February 2013.
15 June This practical one-day masterclass will teach writers how to use a range of social media tools to promote their work.

11-12 May Solve the mystery of how to write gripping crime fiction with a two-day investigation into the genre led by top authors .

How virtual currency Bitcoin has been adopted by the local economy in Kreuzberg, Berlin

John Burnside is gripped by an at times almost unbearably poignant thriller that portrays the flipside of the American dream and how ordinary men can veer into madness


Every month, Sam Jordison will host an online reading group, featuring a book chosen by you. He will give you the background on the author and the world in which the book was written, ask experts in to tackle any points you raise, and invite the author on to the site for a for a live web chat – while you get on with the serious business of talking

Home thoughts, and abroad

It’s been some tiresome time since I last blogged, but a trip to Germany provided some more sombre reasons to worry


Forgive, once again, my lack of blog filing. I have been navigating the joys and wonders provided by English law – losing a home, trying to buy another, firing a bad solicitor, retaining another solicitor to deal with the bad one, finding out how many items the removers who got me from Scotland broke during their progress (most of them) overseeing the new removers taking me out of storage in London (they were wonderfully careful) and their merry, and ultimately futile, attempts to haul my old sofas up my new stairs. I was also as delighted as you can imagine to be technically homeless for three months and end up borrowing other kind people’s premises while trying to keep body and typing together.

It’s been a bumpy time and yet also a wonderful one. I now know I have friends who will support me in all manner of circumstances and that if I ask for help I will get it. I’m very bad at asking for help and it’s a habit I hope I will retain when necessary. I also hope I will remember that when I was at my most vulnerable, still slightly ill, behind with work, in need of cash and with no address, I was held, encouraged and looked after until life slowly evened out and many of the bad things went away.

Of course, I wasn’t that vulnerable. I’m a relatively articulate middle-class person with a passable accent and some funds behind me. Had I been genuinely destitute and really homeless I would have been lost in every sense, because I live in a country which now punishes the weak for their weakness. I am lucky in an unlucky time.

Last week I travelled to the capital of another country – Berlin – to take part in a discussion about the place of writers and artists in the wider world and the role they can have in binding us together, helping us to understand each other, to see that our individual suffering is not greater than anyone else’s, only closer to us and that any suffering is neither a good nor a safe thing for any of us. That’s the kind of stuff they talk about in Berlin. I know because I’ve been there before. It seems they talk about it all the time.

Germany is a country with cause to remember what happens when a population is force-fed a national media diet of fraudulent journalism, threat-mongering hatred and debased gossip. Nazism not only took great care to produce a toxic and dehumanising culture, it sought out and destroyed work that sustained, that inspired, that made private and subversive joys, that gave officially unacceptable lives value and dignity.

Before the wholesale destruction of living, breathing human beings comes the destruction of what they create, the rehearsal of murders in effigy.

Whenever the UK’s national obsession with the second world war rears up around a sports fixture, or an EU wrangle, or a tabloid spat over beach towels, I despair that all we seem to remember about that war is that we won. It’s simply become the ultimate away match. We don’t recall why we won – that a whole nation united in the face of horrible pain and hardships and was supported by its government so it could do so. The short-termism, self-interest and prejudices of our betters crumbled, as did the class divides, and our press eventually had to admit we were all worthwhile.

Would such a thing as have been possible to introduce in the Britain of 1945, or 1949? In 1979? I don’t think so.

As it happens, I have a bedroom over-capacity. My new study could technically be used to house at least two people. I won’t be taxed on it, because I don’t claim benefits. Basically, because I can afford to pay the tax, I don’t have to.

If I had the courage of my convictions I probably should be using the room to house at least two people. In fact, it’s where I work – where I’m working now – and where I store my books, for the first time in my life, all in shelves where I can see them. From here I can see the spine of – the same volume I read in bed when I was a child. It has been my friend for more than 40 years, there for me, a kind light. Here is the volume of I threw across the room when I was a student because it was so amazing, so tender with broken people. Here is and his mind-blowing Lanark, which taught me the courage inherent in thinking and creating when I had no courage of my own. Here is my library.

Here are all my reasons for being inhumanity-averse. Here are all my reasons to take the next step and the next, even when I am tired, or lonely. Here are all the pathways back and forth to be with love, to express love. Here are some of the things that get me through. They are cheap and simple and unelectronic, some of them are very old, or scruffy. They are all threads of life within my life. If they were burned, or lost, or confiscated, or had to be sold they would stay with me indelibly, contagiously – the fire from so many words from so many other minds and lives. Here are gifts which are the opposite of death and silence. They’re not as weak and small as you might think. Onwards.


at 16.53 GMT on Tuesday 5 February 2013. It was last modified at 17.01 GMT on Tuesday 5 February 2013.
15 June This practical one-day masterclass will teach writers how to use a range of social media tools to promote their work.

11-12 May Solve the mystery of how to write gripping crime fiction with a two-day investigation into the genre led by top authors .

How virtual currency Bitcoin has been adopted by the local economy in Kreuzberg, Berlin
– full of ideas and tips about starting your own expat journey.

Whether it’s the Americas, South or East Asia, we have stories about Brits that have taken the plunge to work abroad.

.

Virginia Woolf and other great literary cooks

Publication by a US blog of a recipe for a cottage loaf Virginia Woolf might have cooked has revealed that America shares the British appetite for bookish cooks


When the US food-and-lit blog Paper and Salt () last week published a recipe for a , other sites linked to it eagerly, suggesting America is at least as baking-mad as we are. Even more so, historically, in fact, if – always more plentiful across the Atlantic – are a reliable indication.

‘s loaf, previously cited by Elizabeth David and seemingly involving regular dashes into the kitchen for kneading, is a rare exception to the near-absence of any evidence of British authors doing any cooking themselves in the 150years between (“Emily does the baking”, wrote Charlotte) and Joanne Harris’s post-Chocolat cookbook, The French Kitchen.

In 19th-century America, in contrast, baked bread for her family – with a sideline in desserts such as coconut cake, because, she wryly said, “people must have puddings” – while Harriet Beecher Stowe co-wrote a Mrs Beeton-style household manual.

Thereafter, Paper and Salt and a 1981 anthology called The Great American Writers’ Cookbook, plus authors’ own offerings, make it possible to pursue an American women’s writing course while baking and eating their dishes – from Louisa May Alcott’s apple slump and Edith Wharton’s pumpkin pie (or at least the restaurant recipe she scribbled down and gave to her cook)to ‘s spiced plum pastries, Eudora Welty’s white fruitcake and ‘s tomato soup cake.

More recently, writers have put eating at the centre of individual books, either including recipes in novels, as did in Heartburn, or producing one-off food-focused titles that feature, for example, ‘s Jack Daniels chocolate pecan pie and ‘s peanut butter fudge.

(Male authors increasingly cook too, of course, but – though there are significant exceptions and it would be wrong to represent the split as straightforwardly stereotypical – the recipes we have from them tend to be meat or fish dishes, such as Salman Rushdie’s lamb korma or the fish stew in Ian McEwan’s Saturday).

Harris apart, the most notable British contribution to this tradition is a rebellion against it. In a series of 80s articles, took on the nascent foodie cult (“piggery triumphant has even invaded the pages of the Guardian”) and its patron saint Elizabeth David, unwittingly echoing the fears of – who oscillated between embracing her inner domestic goddess and raging at her – that domesticity meant “stifling yourself byfalling headfirst into a bowl of cookie batter”.

“Oh God, in my misspent youth as a housewife, I too used to bake bread, in those hectic and desolating days just prior to the women’s movement,” wrote Carter, reviewing David’s EnglishBread and Yeast Cookery. “Iused to feel so womanly when I was baking my filthy bread. An ecstasy of false consciousness.”

Carter went on to ridicule Woolf’s enthusiasm for baking as “just the sort of pretentiously frivolous and dilettantish thing a Bloomsbury would be good at”, and her annoying habit of showing her cook how to do it, and to pre-emptively mock as snobbish (“the loaf becomes not foodstuff but fetish”) the real bread movement David’s book helped inspire. Reading her barbs makes you wish The Great British Bake Off had been around 30 years ago so she and David could have gone head to head in a celebrity edition – naturally overseen by Mary Berry, seemed to offer confirmation of Carter’s linkage ofbaking and sexualpolitics.


15 June This practical one-day masterclass will teach writers how to use a range of social media tools to promote their work.

11-12 May Solve the mystery of how to write gripping crime fiction with a two-day investigation into the genre led by top authors .

How virtual currency Bitcoin has been adopted by the local economy in Kreuzberg, Berlin

John Burnside is gripped by an at times almost unbearably poignant thriller that portrays the flipside of the American dream and how ordinary men can veer into madness